Home Menu

Structures, inspection and accountability

 
NAHT_Structures_Inspection.jpg

School leaders understand the need for public accountability. Parents, politicians and the wider public want to be sure that schools are doing their very best for the children they serve.

However, we also recognise that the current low-trust accountability system is based on a narrow range of measures that drive a range of perverse incentives and unintended consequences and that the current high-stakes inspection system all too often instils fear and stifles innovation. 

NAHT is committed to securing fairer methods and measures of accountability, so that pupils’ performance and school effectiveness are judged using a broad range of information, including the school's broader context and performance history, rather than a narrow focus on data.

Ensure published performance data are calculated and used fairly

  • Press the government to take action to ensure understanding across the sector of changes to primary progress data from 2020
  • Engage with the DfE to ensure that the reception baseline assessment is a valid baseline for progress 
  • Work with the DfE to ensure the methodology, publication and use of performance data is accurate, proportionate and appropriate.

 

Press for a transition from vertical high-stakes approach to accountability to a lateral system with greater ownership by the profession itself

  • Further develop, articulate and argue the case for a new approach to school accountability, building on NAHT's Commission, and working with other partners
  • Campaign against a hard accountability measure on exclusions
  • Make the case and lobby for a wholly independent complaints process for appeals against Ofsted inspection judgements
  • Lobby for the publication of all training materials for inspectors to ensure transparency and equity
  • Lobby Ofsted for greater transparency regarding the experience, skills and training of inspectors for specific phases and settings
  • Monitor members' experiences of the new inspection framework, holding Ofsted to account for the consistency, reliability and behaviour of inspectors, particularly around curriculum and the quality of education judgement.

 

Ensure any changes to school structures or systems benefit all pupils within a local community

  • Continue to oppose any form of forced academisation
  • Continue to oppose any expansion of grammar schools
  • Promote and advance local accountability, transparency and democracy in school structures and governance so that schools are best able to serve their wider local community
  • Make the case for centrally coordinated place planning to ensure all new school provision meets demand
  • Promote the full variety of school collaboration from Trusts to informal collaborations. 

Ofsted update September 2024 from NAHT general secretary, Paul Whiteman

Welcome back to the start of a new school year. I hope you had an enjoyable and relaxing break.

The start of a new academic year is always a time for hope and optimism – a time for fresh starts. This year that is true not just in school, but also within the wider policy context in which schools operate.

Ofsted update

This week we have seen a swathe of Ofsted-related announcements. The most eye-catching is the news that from this September, the overall effectiveness grade will be scrapped.

There is no doubt that this is a very welcome move and a major step in the right direction by the new government. NAHT has led the campaign for the removal of Ofsted grades from the very start. As long ago as 2018, our accountability commission highlighted the problems caused by the use of one-word judgements, as well as the harm caused by an overly punitive accountability regime. However, it was the tragic death of Ruth Perry that meant those issues could no longer be ignored by Ofsted and the government, despite their very best efforts to deny anything was wrong. I pay tribute to Julia Waters and the rest of Ruth’s family for their bravery in turning Ruth’s death into a force for change. I am proud that we worked alongside the family and we shouldn’t underestimate the significance of achieving our joint ambition.

We are well aware that this does not solve everything, and we have been open about the fact that we would have liked the government to have gone further and remove subgrades as well. Nevertheless, it is important to see this as a first, interim step towards longer-term reform of inspection. Our task now is to work with the government to help build a fairer, more humane system of accountability as quickly as possible.

We are conscious that the announcement has raised a range of questions. This demonstrates how even apparently simple changes can have wide-ranging effects. These include the impact on section 8 inspections, inspections carried out last summer, and many more. School leaders will quite rightly need answers to those questions as quickly as possible – we are currently seeking those answers and will share details with members as soon as we have them. To help with this, Ofsted has announced that section 5 inspections (also referred to as ‘graded’ inspections) won’t begin until the week beginning 23 September 2024, with section 8 inspections (often known as ‘ungraded’ or short inspections) not beginning until 7 October 2024. This does give us some time to get answers to those key questions that have arisen out of the initial announcement.

 

The Big Listen and Dame Christine Gilbert’s review of Ofsted

Shortly after that announcement, we saw Ofsted release its response to the Big Listen exercise and Dame Christine Gilbert’s independent review.

We commented on both at the time of the release and you can read those comments in full. In short, Dame Christine has shone a spotlight on a number of significant long-standing failings within the inspectorate – read our summary of the report here. There is a sense of vindication for NAHT in this as many of the points she has raised are ones we have been highlighting for some time. In our response, we have been clear that the time for listening is now over and we expect to see Ofsted embark on an urgent programme of cultural and organisational reform.

Once again, school leaders have been proven right, and I want that fact to inspire every member to enter this year with a new-found confidence, particularly when it comes to inspection. For too long there has been a power imbalance between inspectors and school leaders, and this is the time for that to be addressed, one inspection at a time. Where poor practice occurs, we must call it out, and if doing so during an inspection does not address the issue, NAHT will not be afraid to step in to defend our members. 

While we continue to have major concerns about the validity of the Big Listen exercise due to the way many of the questions were framed, and believe that the results have limited value, there are a number of points to highlight in Ofsted’s response. The one that will perhaps have the most immediate impact is the announcement that Ofsted is trialling a new approach whereby notification of all routine inspections will only take place on a Monday. We have broadly welcomed this move as another helpful interim step, meaning that if leaders haven’t had the call on Monday, they know that they don’t have to worry about it for the rest of the week. Read NAHT's full response here.

While such moves are helpful, we remain focused on the need for fundamental long-term reform and a completely new way of inspecting schools that reduces the pressure and stress for all involved. This will remain a high priority for us in the year ahead.

As I said at the start of this message, I believe there are clear signs of hope for the year ahead. The pathway to progress will not always be smooth and there will be times when compromise is inevitable. That being said, the removal of headline Ofsted grades is a significant and symbolic moment and sets the tone for the coming year.

I wish you a successful and positive start to the new school year.

First published 05 September 2024
;