Home Menu

NAHT middle leaders

 

For middle leaders 

NAHT has a category of membership specifically for middle leaders. We offer tailored support and services for middle leaders, online advice and resources, and full trade union protection to give you peace of mind.

Am I eligible? 

To be eligible to join NAHT, you need have a leadership responsibility within an education setting. Roles that are eligible include ALENCO, SENCO, phase leaders and subject leaders. This is not an exhaustive list and if you would like further clarification please email joinus@naht.org.uk.

Join

If you would like to join NAHT, or you’re a current member and would like to speak to someone on the phone, please give us a call on 0300 30 30 333, email us on info@naht.org.uk or click here

Help and advice

 

Classroom 

If you have responsibility in a specific area of the curriculum or are simply interested in best practice, our guides can help. 

Employment

If you want to know about your employment rights and whether you're being treated fairly and consistently, you can find help and advice on matters which may concern you as an employee. 

Management 

If you line manage staff or have accountability for a specific area, you can access help and advice to assist you in making informed decisions when carrying out your role.

 

Latest news 

Schools are ready, but the government needs to work harder on addressing our remaining concerns

Ninety-seven per cent of schools expect to open in full to all pupils next week. The rest will follow shortly after.

That is the message school leaders have given me in their responses to a poll of NAHT members this week.

Despite the delays, U-Turns and chaos across UK governments, school leaders and their teams have stuck to their task, calmly, professionally and with good grace under fire. 

Parents can have confidence that schools will be ready. School leaders have delivered, as they have done right through this pandemic.

With the autumn term just a few days away, we should remember just how tumultuous the last few months have been. 

In March, the government decided to close schools for all but the children of key workers and the most vulnerable. This was the right decision, but the support and advice to schools to make this happen was woeful. Yet school leaders still managed to make that transition safety. 

At the same point, schools worked without clear advice on the curriculum to make sure that education continued, albeit at home, with minimal disruption and maximum impact. 

The government’s response was to allow a few ill-informed but noisy commentators to lament schools’ efforts, with a narrow-minded assumption that every child had easy access to the internet, a device of their own to use and a quiet spot in the house to study. 

Far too many children don’t have any of these things, and in any case, education is a people business. Home study cannot replicate the energy and effectiveness of classroom learning. 

As lockdown wore on, and more and more families felt the squeeze, schools stepped in and fed the most in need while the government voucher scheme crashed due to the demand. 

The government cancelled exams and instituted a standardisation algorithm that prioritised ‘the system’ ahead of individual students. When the impact became clear, Westminster stood rooted like a rabbit in the headlights for several days, before settling on a solution that had always been there – employing the professionalism, dedication and hard work of teachers to assess their students’ abilities accurately. 

For me, the pandemic has shown up how poor large institutions like governments and regulators are at the flexibility that is needed when a crisis comes along. 

Throughout the pandemic, we have seen multiple and repeated failures to properly engage with the professionals to forecast the obvious problems accurately and to use their expertise and knowledge to find innovative and precedent-breaking solutions.

We are starting the new term, not with a clear plan for the next academic year but a reckless refusal of the government to publicly contemplate a Plan B to deal with local or national spikes in infection.

While the political circus continues, everything has rested on the shoulders of school leaders and their teams.

While a few out of touch commentators have claimed to be championing children’s best interests, the professionals are the ones showing the real care and attention for young people. 

School leaders are very confident that they have put in place all the measures that they can to make next week a success. Concerns remain about issues outside of the school gates. 

Only about seven per cent of school leaders are confident in the current arrangements for tracking and tracing covid-19 carriers. Only 18 per cent are confident in the arrangements for a lockdown in their area.

Make no mistake; the return to school is a complex operation. The best-laid plans will be sternly tested when they come into contact with the real world in the coming weeks. Schools have done what they can. If the R rate increases, it would be entirely wrong to lay any blame for that at the door of school leaders. 

Civil servants have been blamed for recent failings and removed from their posts; this must not happen to educators. 

School leaders and their teams, who have worked hard so far, will not stand for any blame-shifting if problems arise.

Unfair criticism and scapegoating already mean that too many leaders leave prematurely, and too few graduates are attracted to join the profession. 

Fortunately, school leaders and their teams have not been distracted. They have demonstrated that at the school level, the focus really is on children. 

Let’s leave the lazy criticisms of lockdown behind us. The message from the profession is ‘we’ll do our jobs’ – now the politicians need to do theirs. 

First published 28 August 2020
;