Home Menu

NAHT middle leaders

 

For middle leaders 

NAHT has a category of membership specifically for middle leaders. We offer tailored support and services for middle leaders, online advice and resources, and full trade union protection to give you peace of mind.

Am I eligible? 

To be eligible to join NAHT, you need have a leadership responsibility within an education setting. Roles that are eligible include ALENCO, SENCO, phase leaders and subject leaders. This is not an exhaustive list and if you would like further clarification please email joinus@naht.org.uk.

Join

If you would like to join NAHT, or you’re a current member and would like to speak to someone on the phone, please give us a call on 0300 30 30 333, email us on info@naht.org.uk or click here

Help and advice

 

Classroom 

If you have responsibility in a specific area of the curriculum or are simply interested in best practice, our guides can help. 

Employment

If you want to know about your employment rights and whether you're being treated fairly and consistently, you can find help and advice on matters which may concern you as an employee. 

Management 

If you line manage staff or have accountability for a specific area, you can access help and advice to assist you in making informed decisions when carrying out your role.

 

Latest news 

NAHT responds to DfE consultation on new intervention powers against schools judged ‘below good’ on two consecutive occasions

NAHT has signalled its strong opposition to DfE plans to make schools with two consecutive ‘below good’ judgements eligible for intervention from September 2022.

NAHT’s consultation response sets out its strong disagreement with the principle and policy intent underpinning the proposals, which:

  • misunderstand the statutory and practical role of inspection
  • seek to use a ‘requires improvement’ judgement as an inappropriate and flawed indicator for intervention
  • envisage using the Coasting Schools (England) Regulations 2017 in a way not originally intended by parliament
  • risk destabilising the improvement journeys of individual schools
  • require changes to Ofsted’s inspection framework, methodology, training and quality assurance processes
  • create new risks to leadership recruitment and retention
  • breaches DfE’s 2017 protocol for changes to accountability
  • lacks transparency and accountability over regional directors’ roles.


Read our full response here

First published 23 June 2022
;